|
Emergency
Management as a Profession By David T.
Crews, CEM, Emergency Management
Gold! Webmaster
“The
primary activities of Emergency Management and First Response differ,
and they both require personnel who are competent, highly skilled,
trained, and experienced in their own specific professional areas.” Introduction
Background
In the 1970’s, there was a growing awareness in the United States, that large and catastrophic disasters required extraordinary response at all levels of Federal, State and Local government. Costs of disasters in the U.S. were soaring for governments and there was a need to create a Public Law in order to provide for Federal mitigation, readiness, response and recovery structures, with resource application, in a cost-benefit manner that met the needs of the citizens and the economy. Growing populations and higher concentrations of economic resources in specific geographical areas are being adversely affected by natural and man-made disasters, and these are having greater impact on the “Quality of Life” issues in the U.S. The
Federal Emergency Management Agency (U.S.) was established by the U.S.
Congress in 1979. Following
that, in 1988, the Federal Government passed The Robert T. Stafford
Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, (hereafter referred to
as the Stafford Act) of 1988, which replaced the Civil Defense Act of
1950. The Stafford Act provides for an “All-Hazard Authority” in
dealing with risks and tasks involved in disaster activities.
To administer Emergency Management programs under the Stafford
Act, the Federal, State and Local governments began training individuals
to perform Emergency Management functions in all levels of Government
and in Non-Government Organizations (NGOs).
Standards
As the Emergency Management systems are
maturing, standards are being adopted
Discussion With the creation of the Federal Emergency Management Agency in the United States, the profession of Emergency Management came into it’s own. Emergency Management differs from the Emergency Services (ES), sometimes referred to as “First Response” disciplines, which are familiar to most people. First Response disciplines are usually linked to personnel in fire, police, Emergency Medical Services, and public works (civil engineers) services. From the beginning, Emergency Management as a profession has been misunderstood as a distinct and separate career field from other ES professions. What
distinguishes Emergency Management from the other more traditional ES
disciplines is in the nature and character of its activities and roles
in disaster readiness and response. First response can be considered
more tactical in application of management principals, while Emergency
Management is more strategic and long range. First Response generally
operates in an emergency environment which is smaller in scope (small
geographical area, fewer people and economic resources affected). Both
Emergency Management and First Response are valuable community
resources. For an "All Hazards" approach as outlined in
the Stafford Act, Emergency Management is "longer in range"
and must cross more of the traditional political, bureaucratic and
administrative boundaries (sometimes called "partnering") in
order to lessen the impacts of a major disaster on a geographical area.
At the Federal level, this “partnering” has been formalized in the
Federal Response Plan. Mitigation and preparation are the main
focus for Emergency Management. Conversely, Response and Recovery
are the main focus of First Response, and both operate together
strategically and tactically as conditions dictate. Because recovery is
usually a long-term activity, Emergency Management is also heavily
engaged in programs for Business Recovery, Individual and Public
Assistance (Government to Government) programs. Conclusions In their primary and “strategic” roles, Emergency Managers must analyze the threat to economic and population centers; determine the significance of that threat, gauge the potential scope of the threat (size and impact); project threat frequency and provide a course of action (Emergency Operations Plan) for governing bodies. They must also identify, satisfy and coordinate requirements that are identified in risk (threat) analysis through application of assets in geographically administered areas by integrating and using Academic, Business & Industry, Government, and Volunteer resources. Emergency managers also are required to tactically respond in support of the Emergency Operations Plan when circumstances dictate. They are often in charge of Emergency Operations Centers (EOCs) with critical information and communications resources during large disasters and catastrophes. Money
and fiscal policy are required for viable Emergency Management programs
in order to man, equip, train, and maintain a "state of
readiness." Motivation to mitigate and reduce or negate
disaster impacts will determine the level of readiness of a geographical
area. It takes a certain amount of fiscal resource to perform
this strategic function. Governing bodies are an integral part of
Emergency Management programs because they are the legal bodies that set
policy, enact legislation and have the legal authority over how public
and private monies are acquired, used and disposed of. Emergency
managers must work with governing bodies to create public policy,
strategically plan, and to reduce or eliminate duplication of effort or
misapplication of resources. Coordination
and strategic planning between resource owners to satisfy disaster
requirements is a key responsibility of the Emergency Manager. This
management effort will produce the some of the best cost-benefit
outcomes possible in the saving of lives and the protection of property. Recommendation
Anyone
engaged in emergency management should continue with self-improvement, References
Crews,
D., 1999, Why Emergency Management as a Profession? American Society of Professional Emergency Planners (ASPEP) Journal,.
pp. 23-25. NFPA
1600 Standard on
Disaster/Emergency Management and Business Continuity Programs 2000
Edition. NFPA International,
1 Battery Park, Quincy, MA., February 2000. Student
Manual (SM 230), Introduction to Emergency Management,
FEMA Emergency Management Institute, July 1990.
pp. II-18 to II-II-25. Notes
CV: David T. Crews, CEM currently works in Information and Planning, Emergency Support Function 5 (ESF-5) for FEMA Region 7, as a Disaster Assistance Employee (DAE), in Information and Planning. He has been deployed to over 10 disasters in the past four years: California (1), Colorado (1), Georgia (1), Kansas (2), Iowa (3) Nebraska (2) Nevada (1) and Missouri (1). His background experience includes Major Command Staff Duty with the United States Air Force (USAF) in electronics, inspection (IG), maintenance, training, photo mapping and plans. Served as a Director on the Logistics Dais in NORAD (North American Air Defense Command), Cheyenne Mountain Complex and Headquarters Staff with the responsibility for Strategic Planning the recovery and reconstitution of the North American Continent. Served as the Mayor of Clearwater, Kansas for three years and as a Director of Emergency Management in local county government for two years. He has worked seven years in Emergency Management with an additional military equivalent experience of eight years. Education and training includes a Bachelors Degree from Kansas State University in Sociology and graduate studies at Chapman University, California in Education and Public Administration at Wichita State University (WSU), Kansas. Completed Certificates in Computer Applications and Supervision from WSU. A graduate of Squadron Officers School, Air Force Command and Staff College, and The National Defense University (NDU). Completed the FEMA Professional Development Series (PDS) in 1994. Earned a Certified Emergency Manager (CEM) Certificate in 1995 through the International Association of Emergency Managers (IAEM) and has been re-certified to the year 2006. Resident Courses in Emergency Management at the Emergency Management Institute (EMI), Emmitsburg, Maryland include: Integrated Emergency Management Systems, Telecommunications and Warning, Emergency Support Function (ESF) 5, Community Relations Officer, Mission Assignments, National Emergency Management Information System (NEMIS), and the Planning and Analysis Courses. Specialized training includes: Joint Operations Planning System, Hazardous Materials, Radiological, Incident Command Systems, and Nuclear, Biological, Chemical hazards. His professional affiliations include the International Association of Emergency Managers, Emergency Information Infrastructure Partnership, the American Society of Professional Emergency Planners, Civil Air Patrol, American Radio Relay League ARRL, Disaster Emergency Response Association ( DERA), Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials (APCO), National Emergency Management Association (NEMA), and the National Association for Search and Rescue (NASAR). |